does it make sense in the .desktop file?

Date: 2011-01-28 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I've definitely wished for something like Leechblock for the desktop a times, but I'm not sure that doing it in the desktop file makes the most sense. First, that would complicate the process of getting it set compared to just having configuration somewhere since configuring it would come down to "menu editing" with user overrides of files in /usr/share/applications. Second, I'm not sure that it's obvious there is exactly one thing we'd want - allowed hours - it seems like something you'd want to play with. I don't want to be forbidden to use xchat during work hours, but maybe I'd like to be able to say that I can only spend 1 hour total in the day in xchat.

What I was idly thinking of was a GNOME 3 shell extension - that would allow a lot of flexibility - it could allow the program to be running but just not allow switching to it, etc. And it could just read config for the user that would refer to application ID (that is, the name of the desktop file).

- Owen
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

marnanel: (Default)
Monument

January 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios