marnanel: (Default)
Monument ([personal profile] marnanel) wrote2014-06-26 03:54 pm

Today in a newsagent's

Newsagent: That'll be £2.55, please.
Marn: Oh! Shame it's not £2.56.
Newsagent: Why?
Marn: Well, it's a square of squares. Four squared is sixteen, sixteen squared is 256. It's a very pleasing number.
Newsagent (obligingly): Well, you can pay £2.56 if you LIKE.
Marn: All right, then.
Newsagent: Well then, that'll be £2.56, please.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2014-06-26 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
When I was little I remember thinking 255 rather than 256 was the really important one of the two numbers for a long time – because it was the one that actually came up all the time in my experience, being the maximum x-coordinate on the Spectrum screen :-)

[personal profile] treeowl 2014-06-27 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Both of them are nice, really. Which you prefer depends on whether you like to count nodes or leaves.